Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Government Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Perry County fiscal court approves resolutions, contracts and grants including LGEDF application and 911 upgrade requests

Perry County Fiscal Court · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The fiscal court approved numerous routine and disaster-related actions: resolution 2026-004 (LGEDF application for $470,087.35), multiple NRCS/DEMOLITION contract awards and a $19,079.80 draw request for the Upper Second Creek sewer phase 1 project; the court also approved first reading of a $250,000 flood study grant amendment and two 911 grant applications.

Perry County fiscal court voted on a slate of routine and disaster-recovery items during its meeting, approving resolutions, contract awards and grant applications by voice vote.

Key approvals included: • Resolution 2026-004: application to the Local Government Economic Development Fund (LGEDF) for bond payment no. 3 in the amount of $470,087.35 to support buildings in the industrial park (approved by voice vote).

• Draw request: Upper Second Creek sewer Phase 1 — $19,079.80. Funding sources cited included the Kentucky Infrastructure Authority (KIA) line 22CWS087, Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) funds and a Community Development Block Grant; officials emphasized exact-cent accounting for grant funds (approved).

• NRCS demolition and clearance contracts: a series of awards were approved for EWP/NRCS projects (Razorback Trucking, W.R. Miller & Sons and others) with itemized amounts for specific sites; officials noted that these are reimbursable federal projects and bids followed procurement rules (approved).

• Budget amendment (first reading): a $250,000 amendment for the Eastern Kentucky General Investigation (flood study) grant with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was approved for first reading; county attorneys and staff noted the grant imposes no general-fund local cost.

• 911 grant resolutions (2026-005 and 2026-006): the court authorized submission of a phone-system refresh grant to enable text/video 911 reception and a separate grant for next-generation dispatcher console upgrades; staff said the phone system had not been updated since 2015 (approved).

Most items passed on voice votes with “aye” recorded; the meeting transcript lists movers and seconders for each motion but did not present individual roll-call tallies in the record.

Officials said the awards for disaster-related contracts are reimbursable and that the county typically up-fronts costs, submits receipts and later requests reimbursement from federal/state partners.