Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Lake Stevens staff advises caution on council-run social media; council may operate personal pages but bears records responsibility

City Council of Lake Stevens · April 15, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff briefed the council on risks and technical limits of city-sponsored social-media accounts and recommended council members be allowed to run their own pages provided they follow a screenshot-and-retain public-records workflow; council debated pros and cons of an official city-managed council page.

City staff told the Lake Stevens Council April 14 that creating a city-managed council social-media presence poses significant public-records and operational risks, and recommended council members operating personal or member-managed pages accept responsibility for capturing and retaining public records.

Staff said vendor options and Facebook settings were vetted but that the city could not guarantee retention and comment-control requirements on third-party platforms. The clerk and records staff recommended council members capture each post by screenshot, email it to themselves with a subject line describing the topic for records-searchability, and re-capture any subsequent comments or edits so the city can respond to public-records requests. IT staff highlighted metadata and OCR issues and noted that some archival tools can OCR images, but that public-records staff must configure systems properly to include that content in searches.

Council members expressed differing preferences: some favored continuing to ask staff to post city summaries to the official city Facebook page and develop automated YouTube timestamps for meeting topics; others said they prefer a private council member page to engage constituents but acknowledged the records-management burden. Staff and the city attorney warned of litigation and discovery risks (citing Spokane Valley cases where social-media records became the subject of litigation) and said the city would remain ultimately responsible for producing records if requested.

Direction: Staff will continue to explore technical options (including YouTube timestamping and limited recap automation) and provided guidance for council members who choose to post: capture screenshots promptly, use city email for follow-up, and coordinate with records officers when a public-records request arrives.