Sanitary Board approves invoices and pay applications, adds $75,000 engineering amendment
Loading...
Summary
The Sanitary Board approved several vendor invoices and two contractor pay applications, and approved a $75,000 engineering amendment to cover resident project representative services through construction completion; approvals were by voice vote and individual tallies were not recorded in the transcript.
The Sanitary Board voted to approve a set of vendor invoices and contractor payments and to add $75,000 to an engineering amendment for RPR services.
The approvals included a Thrasher invoice for Hartsburg Phase 5 for $23,000; a $25,000 pressure/engineer invoice for the Clarksburg Arlington Sewer Extension; an invoice for the Wolf Summit project listed in the transcript as “$27,000.67 80” (formatting in the record is unclear); contractor pay application number 14 to Independent Enterprises Inc. for $1,254,183.07; and a pay application to Pro Pro Contracting, Inc. for the Wolf Summit project for $254,007.29. A separate motion added $75,000 to engineering amendment number 4 to fund resident project representative services from December 2025 through project completion (anticipated date listed in the record as 04/17/2026).
Committee member S2 moved to approve the Thrasher Hartsburg invoice, saying, “I approve that invoice in the amount of $23,000,” and the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. Similar motions for the Arlington invoice, the Wolf Summit invoice, the two contractor pay applications and the engineering amendment were each moved, seconded and approved by voice vote; the transcript records affirmations of "Aye" but does not list individual roll-call tallies.
Why this matters: These approvals release significant construction funds and authorize additional engineering oversight as the board moves toward construction completion across multiple sewer projects. The engineering amendment will increase on-site oversight costs but is intended to cover extended construction and closeout work.
The board did not record detailed roll-call vote tallies in the transcript; all motions were approved by voice vote. No further conditions or contingency language for these payments appears in the meeting record. The board moved next to reports.
