Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Traffic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Middletown council adopts stricter traffic-impact study rules for subdivision reviews
Summary
The Town of Middletown adopted new rules requiring an initial traffic memorandum and thresholded full traffic-impact studies with mitigation recommendations, after the planning board and town consultants sought clearer, more actionable reporting from applicants.
The Town of Middletown on March 16 adopted amendments adding Appendix D to the town's subdivision rules to set traffic-impact study requirements for proposed developments. The planning board and town consultant created a two-step process: a short initial traffic memorandum for every application and, if triggered by thresholds, a full study that must include data, a capacity analysis and specific mitigation recommendations.
Ron, a planning-board representative, told the council the changes respond to a pattern of reports that present numbers but stop short of clear conclusions. He said the new guidelines were developed "with Crossman Engineering to think about what types of information would better serve the planning board" and that Crossman will serve as a third-party reviewer.
Paul Croce, a resident who addressed the council, said past traffic reports were inconsistent in format and often ended with vague conclusions such as "the project can be safely accommodated" without defining what "safe" means. "When a detailed study is needed, continued analysis of accident history, sight distances, traffic counts and intersection congestion will be required," Croce said, urging stronger conclusions and explicit mitigation measures.
Councilors questioned who pays for peer review and whether requirements could impose costs on very small subdivisions. Town staff and the planning-board representatives said applicants pay for both the initial memo and, if required, the full study or any peer review; the initial two-page screening memo is designed to spare minimal projects from heavy expense.
The council passed a motion to receive and adopt the amendments by voice vote. The new appendix gives reviewers a clearer checklist for evidence and asks applicants to include future traffic conditions and known planned projects in their analyses, along with conclusive statements on impacts and recommended mitigation.
