Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Woodinville council approves Green Partners development agreement after extended public debate, 6–1
Summary
After lengthy public comment and council debate about parking, height, and promises to preserve Molbacs, the council voted 6–1 to approve Resolution No. 675, a development agreement with Green Partners for a phased downtown project that includes an affordable-housing option, public plaza/spray park and adaptive reuse of an existing warehouse.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Woodinville City Council approved a development agreement with Green Partners on March 17, voting 6–1 after extended public comment about the project’s size, historic losses and the value of negotiated public benefits.
The agreement (Resolution No. 675) covers a roughly 19.2‑acre downtown project the staff presentation describes as a multi‑phase development that could include about 1,300 housing units, an estimated 1,800 parking spaces, roughly 89,000 square feet of retail/office space and a possible 200‑room hotel. The development would be built in five to seven phases; staff said permits for phase one have already been submitted.
Key negotiated public benefits included income‑restricted housing and options for how that housing is provided: Green Partners may deliver 10% of units at 80% area median income (AMI) with no tax benefit, or opt for 15% of units at 60% AMI through the Multi‑Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) program. Staff and the applicant told the council the flexibility is designed to accommodate different financing or sales strategies by phase; staff also said Green Partners agreed to guarantee at least 100 affordable units at full buildout with a minimum of 40 affordable units delivered within the first two phases.
Other public benefits listed in the agreement include a $200,000 contribution from Green Partners toward a publicly owned spray park (the city would ultimately manage the facility), an adaptive reuse commitment for an existing warehouse on site intended to serve as a temporary public market and an advance of up to $1,000,000 in park‑impact fees to support the Wilmot Gateway Park stage and other park improvements. The agreement includes haul‑route repair obligations and stepback design requirements the council requested during negotiation.
Public comment before the vote was sharply divided. Dozens of residents urged the council to reject or renegotiate the deal, saying the developer had sought height and density bonuses while offering inadequate public benefits and that demolition at the Molbacs site erased an irreplaceable local landmark. ‘‘Approving the deal with Green Partners would tell the entire community that the needs of developers … supersede the overwhelming voice of your constituents,’’ one commenter said. The applicant’s representative, Jason Henderson of Green Partners, disputed those claims and said his firm had a long history of supporting the Molbacs store and had offered rent relief and lease extensions; he said the partnership envisioned continuity and a replacement Molbacs facility in phase one if economics allowed.
Council debate covered tradeoffs between additional height/density and public benefits, traffic and parking impacts, and how to ensure the adaptive reuse market and spray park would be delivered in early phases. Council members stressed the need to continue reviewing permits and clarified that many details (parking counts, unit mixes and exact phasing) will be resolved during the building permit process.
Deputy Mayor Randolph moved approval of Resolution No. 675 and Council member Evans seconded. The motion carried 6–1 (Council member Taylor opposed). The council and staff agreed to return with further permit details and monitoring as the project proceeds.
Why it matters: The agreement unlocks additional height and zoning bonuses in Woodinville’s downtown core to facilitate a large mixed‑use redevelopment while formalizing a set of public benefits meant to address affordable housing, open space and downtown activation. Opponents say the deal favors the developer and fails to guarantee promised community benefits in a binding, phase‑by‑phase way; supporters say the agreement is the best mechanism to secure early delivery of public improvements and affordable units rather than letting the site be developed piecemeal under base zoning.
Next steps: Staff will report back to council as building permits and phased designs are submitted, and the city will track delivery of the adaptive reuse market, the spray park funding and the initial affordable units.
