Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Code Lobbying topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Knox County subcommittee keeps one-year lobbying ban, forwards ethics code to full committee
Summary
The Knox County Ethics Committee Subcommittee voted to retain a one-year ban on former local officials representing clients before the county and approved forwarding the revised Code of Ethics to the full Ethics Committee for a vote.
The Knox County Ethics Committee Subcommittee on Policies and Procedures voted to keep the county's post-service lobbying prohibition at one year and approved sending the proposed Code of Ethics updates to the full Ethics Committee for consideration.
The subcommittee debated section 4.6, which bars a person who has been elected to any county office from personally representing another person or entity for compensation before the governing body of which the person was an officer. Miss Gibson, who researched national practice, noted that "the national standard is 2 years," but after discussion Chair Biddle said he preferred to "leave it at 1 year, for now." The motion to retain the one-year restriction was made, seconded, and passed by voice vote.
Members also examined definitions tied to domestic-abuse language to clarify who counts as a "relative" for ethics purposes. Miss Gibson presented the domestic-abuse definition from the Tennessee Code Annotated for comparison, and members debated whether the ethics definition should explicitly include former spouses, adoption and foster relationships, and whether residency in the same household should be determinative. Mister Sanders advised caution about inquiring into private relationships, saying probing "is a policy issue more than a legal issue" and noting it could lead meetings to "get out of control." The subcommittee did not make a substantive change to expand the definition during the meeting but discussed adding clarification about former spouses.
The subcommittee recorded a motion to present the revised Code of Ethics to the full Ethics Committee; that motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. The chair said the subcommittee intends to conclude its work at its next meeting and seek full-committee action in early May, followed by presentation to the County Commission in late May.
Next steps: the revised Code of Ethics will be placed on the full Ethics Committee agenda for a vote. The subcommittee also signaled it will refine a procedural flowchart before the full-committee review.
