Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Falmouth water committee tables proposal to bar reading of written public comments

Water Quality Management Committee · March 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After residents urged the committee to preserve mailed and emailed comments, the Water Quality Management Committee voted to table a proposal that would limit public comment to in‑person attendees and not read correspondence into the record.

The Water Quality Management Committee on March 18 voted to table a proposal that would limit public comment to people attending meetings and exclude reading written correspondence aloud, instead placing submissions in the minutes.

The policy change was introduced by the chair as a way to align committee practice with recent Town Council guidance. Matt Hanley of Thomas Linus Road told the committee he was "very alarmed" by the proposal, saying it would exclude residents who cannot attend because of disability, weather or other barriers and could silence expert input submitted by mail or email.

"Public comment is very important," Hanley said. "If people want to make a statement and they can't come, are we going to ignore their statements?"

Hilda Menge of the Green Center asked how many letters the committee actually receives and recommended reading a small number aloud if the volume is low and offering a two‑minute non‑agenda comment period like the Select Board uses. The chair responded that Town Council raised the issue during open‑meeting training and advised the committee to include correspondence in the record but not read it aloud.

A committee member moved to table the proposed rule pending more information and a written opinion from Town Council; the motion carried. The committee did not adopt the new public‑comment rule at the meeting.

The committee said it will seek a written clarification from Town Council and consider bringing the issue back as a standalone agenda item in a future meeting.

Next steps: the item is tabled pending a written opinion from Town Council and further committee discussion.