Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Track Construction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears recommendation to paint long‑jump boards rather than cut new track
Summary
District staff and an on‑call architect recommended painting long‑jump boards on the recently installed track rather than cutting in inserts, citing drainage and surface concerns; painting would reduce cost and not affect hosting competitions, they said.
During the superintendent’s report board members raised construction questions about long‑jump boards that were in the track specifications. Superintendent (speaker 2) summarized concerns from the contractor and asked an on‑call architect/engineer (Tommy, speaker 12) to explain options.
Tommy said long‑jump boards can be either installed as inserts in the track surface or painted on, and that many schools use painted markings. "These particularly were designed, to be inserted in the, in the track... we just don't feel comfortable cutting into the new track surface and having... exposing water to that," he said, recommending paint rather than cutting into a recently installed surface. He added that painting is typical and a common preference among coaches; in the district’s case painting would avoid cutting into a new surface and likely save money.
Board members discussed whether painted boards would affect the district’s ability to host meets; staff said it would not. One board member noted that many visiting facilities use tape or painted marks and that painted boards are accepted by competition officials. The superintendent said staff would confirm coach input and, if the board agrees, proceed with painting pending weather and contractor schedule.
Outcome: The group indicated a preference for painting the jump boards to avoid cutting into the new track and to limit drainage risk; staff will coordinate with the contractor and coaches and proceed if conditions allow.
