Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Nutrition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board pulls USDA Child Nutrition agreement for internal review as breakfast program logistics studied
Summary
The board removed item 13b (Ohio USDA Child Nutrition Programs agreement) from tonight's agenda and directed staff to study logistics, costs and reimbursement levels — the superintendent cited elementary participation of about 81 students (≈27%) and indicated further discussion and a report back to the board in April.
The Cuyahoga Heights Board of Education pulled item 13b — the Ohio USDA Child Nutrition Programs agreement — from the agenda to allow staff time for internal discussions about whether and how to expand the breakfast program to middle and high school students.
Superintendent Young said the district implemented a breakfast program at the elementary school after a one‑year waiver and that the elementary site now averages about 81 students per day using the program, which he said aligns with state reporting that about 27% of elementary students are eligible. He said high‑school/middle‑school eligibility was reported at about 22% last year, but the district previously requested a one‑year waiver for that group. "If we're gonna continue, which we are at the threshold to do that, we would need to mark that," the superintendent said when explaining why the item was pulled; he told the board staff would meet internally and bring a recommendation back in April.
Board members discussed operational constraints: the middle school currently uses the cafeteria as a holding area where attendance and announcements happen, so adding breakfast service would require identifying a different location or implementing a grab‑and‑go system; the superintendent explained that elementary implementation required physical changes and asbestos abatement and cost about $20,000–$25,000. He also noted the per‑meal reimbursement appears low (roughly $0.30 per meal as discussed in the meeting). The superintendent and other staff said they believe the district can manage the necessary administrative work but need to consider logistics (serving locations, staffing and cleanliness in shared spaces) before checking the required box on the state application.
No final action was taken; board members said staff should prepare more information and return to the board for a decision. The item was removed from the consent agenda so the board could examine costs, reimbursements and operations before making a formal decision.
