Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Landfill Bids topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Brown County opens sealed bids for Landfill Cell 5; lowest bid about $1.75 million

Brown County Commission · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff read sealed bids for construction of Landfill Cell 5. Foothills Contracting submitted the lowest bid at about $1.75 million; commissioners referred all bids to staff for responsiveness and math checks and asked for a recommendation next week.

County staff opened sealed bids for construction of Cell 5 at the Brown County Landfill and read contractor names and base bids aloud during the commission meeting.

Staff reported the bids as read: Midland Contracting Inc. (Olga, S.D.) $2,524,525.07; Louiza Construction Inc. (Flanger, S.D.) $2,560,000.00; Foothills Contracting Inc. (Webster, S.D.) $1,753,967.68 (the transcript also contains a near‑identical alternate cents figure of $1,753,967.58); Domi Construction/Construction Cove (Aberdeen area) $2,830,959.50; Border State Saving Inc. (Fargo, N.D.) $4,536,824.00; and B and B Contracting Inc. (Aberdeen) $3,315,466.48. The commission noted an internal project estimate of roughly $3.3 million.

Staff said they would perform a cursory check for responsiveness at the meeting and then conduct an in‑depth review — including a math check — and return a recommendation to the commission. Commissioners discussed available grant funding that could cover as much as about 18.2% of the project (quoted as up to $665,000), but staff said the final selected bid and overall costs will determine the actual grant usage and the county may end up below that cap.

After the bids were read, the commission voted to refer the bids to staff for detailed review and a later recommendation. The motion to refer was recorded in the meeting as “motion by Weis, seconded by Dinger” and carried on a voice vote. Staff and commissioners said they expect to present a recommendation next week, at which time the commission may act on an award.

The county’s stated next step is the staff responsiveness and math review followed by a formal recommendation to the commission; no contract award was made at this meeting.