Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dripping Springs council approves resolution to seek TxDOT approval for three gateway monuments
Summary
The City of Dripping Springs approved a resolution authorizing staff to pursue Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) approval for two gateway monuments on US 290 and one on RM 12 and to negotiate related agreements; staff said $121,200 in this year’s signage budget could apply to signage work. One council member opposed the measure on cost‑priority grounds.
The Dripping Springs City Council voted to approve a resolution allowing the city to pursue Texas Department of Transportation approval for the design and location of two gateway monuments on U.S. 290 and one on RM 12 and to authorize the city administrator to negotiate and execute related TxDOT agreements.
A city staff member told the council the resolution does not itself obligate construction funding; it clears the administrative step so TxDOT can consider designs and locations. “Our report is on file,” the staff member said, and staff noted TxDOT area engineer Orlando Gallegos must sign off on final designs before the monuments move forward. The staff presentation said the city has $121,200 in this year’s signage budget that could be applied to wayfinding or gateway monuments but that staff’s priority recommendation is to focus on wayfinding signs, which are smaller and removable.
Council debate was brief. One council member said he would oppose the resolution on cost‑priority grounds, arguing that given recent discussions about wastewater rates, “the last thing we should be spending money on is signs as nice as they may look.” Despite that objection, a motion to approve the resolution was made, seconded and carried by voice vote.
The motion authorizes the city administrator to negotiate and execute the TxDOT Gateway Monument Agreement and other related documents; staff said any construction or maintenance obligations would be considered separately and only after TxDOT approval and further council decisions. The council did not detail a construction timeline or a final funding commitment when it approved the resolution.
What happens next: staff will seek formal TxDOT approval and solicit bids if the council later decides to proceed with construction. The resolution only enabled staff to pursue TxDOT review and to begin negotiating agreements.
