Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors approve downtown revitalization financing district despite transparency concerns
Summary
The board approved a downtown tax increment financing plan intended to steer up to about $610 million toward office‑to‑housing conversions, but critics warned it redirects taxpayer dollars to private developments and lacks a public list of the 48 properties analysts used in revenue estimates.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted on Feb. 3 to establish a downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District intended to encourage office‑to‑residential conversions and spur downtown housing. The budget legislative analyst projected the program could divert up to roughly $610 million in tax increment over the program term to support conversions.
Supervisor Fielder led objections, calling the plan a giveaway of public dollars to private developers and urging higher inclusionary requirements. “This plan diverts $610,000,000 in taxpayer revenue into private hands to use for market rate developments,” Fielder said, adding that exemptions and waived impact fees risk reduced affordable housing outcomes.
Supervisor Chan and others pressed for transparency about an analyst estimate that 48 properties in the district area were used to calculate projected revenue. Jacob Dimpleff of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development told the board the 48 figure came from a high‑level consultant exercise that estimated candidates based on building age, vacancy and floor‑plate size, not a site‑specific parcel list. “They did not do a site specific inventory that identified specific properties that would convert,” Dimpleff said.
Supporters said the district is a time‑limited, targeted financing tool with required board review for projects and annual reporting. Supervisor Dorsey described the plan as an adaptive reuse strategy to re‑energize downtown: “As an adaptive reuse plan, this is also a once in a lifetime opportunity for us to correct twentieth century land use decisions.”
After debate, the board adopted the resolution with a roll call showing seven ayes and four no votes; supervisors Walton, Chan, Chen and Fielder voted no. The board and staff noted guardrails, including a sunset date and required project review by the district board.
What’s next: The newly authorized district will begin implementation steps, including the downtown revitalization financing plan, potential judicial validation and project enrollment through the district board. Supervisors who voted for more transparency said they will follow up on publishing more detailed lists and fiscal oversight reports as projects come forward.
