Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Restorative justice group asks for $18,007.50 to expand services to adults; committee debate opens

Joint Commission of the Budget · April 17, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A restorative justice provider requested $18,007.50 from Knox County to extend its restorative practices to adults (18–26), citing reduced youth referrals and local support from the sheriff and district attorney; committee members expressed both support and strong opposition.

A restorative justice organization representative (name not given in the transcript) asked the Knox County budget committee for $18,007.50 to expand the group’s services to adults, saying the program has demonstrably reduced youth referrals and that the district attorney and sheriff support offering similar services to emerging adults.

The presenter described the program’s model — face‑to‑face restorative circles, victim‑centered agreements and follow‑through — and said it has reduced juvenile referrals in Knox County from historically high rates to lower levels. “We’ve actually been successful,” the presenter said, noting contracts with the Department of Corrections for juvenile cases and recent federal grant funding elsewhere that supports related work.

Committee members divided. Supporters argued the program can save county resources by keeping lower‑level offenders out of jail and reducing long‑term costs. One committee member urged the county to consider opioid‑settlement and other grant opportunities to fund adult restorative work. A different committee member, noting serious violent crimes reported locally, said she would vote against funding the expansion and expressed concern about public safety.

Committee members asked about sustainability and whether youth services would be jeopardized if funds shifted to adults; the presenter said youth services currently have other funding sources and that adult expansion would be limited to priority cases if funded.

Because the committee lacked a quorum, no formal vote occurred at this meeting. The division among members signals further debate ahead as budget decisions are finalized.