Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Committee hears bill letting Delaware Electric Cooperative decline default service to very large new loads
Loading...
Summary
Chair Sen. Stephanie Hanson and Delaware Electric Cooperative representatives described SB 276, which would allow DEC to refuse standard-offer (default) service to prospective loads projected to exceed 50 MW monthly demand; cooperative counsel and DEC officials said the change protects members from procurement and cost exposure.
Senator Stephanie Hanson introduced Senate Bill 276 at the April 15 committee meeting, saying the 1999 Electric Utility Restructuring Act created a standard offer service (SOS) framework that does not fit extremely large loads such as data centers. Hanson said SB 276 would change DEC's default SOS obligation so the cooperative would have the right, but not the obligation, to provide electric supply to prospective customers projected to exceed 50 megawatts of monthly demand.
"This change will protect DEC and its members because it will no longer have the legal obligation to serve large loads if DEC cannot reliably provide the service, or providing the service would raise the cost on its existing members," Hanson said.
Jamie Nutter, attorney with Parkowski Swayze representing Delaware Electric Cooperative, told the committee the bill helps DEC manage load growth and procurement exposure. "If under the standard offer service obligation as the default provider we would then have to go out and procure that power," Nutter said, noting DEC nd its supplier group self-supply a significant share of members' power and that a sudden very large load could expose members to volatile market prices.
Kevin Gingley, vice president of member services at Delaware Electric Cooperative, said the cooperative serves roughly 125,000 members in Kent and Sussex counties and that the bill helps protect service reliability and cost competitiveness for those members.
Senator Patty John noted she is a cosponsor and said cooperative generation arrangements differ from investor-owned utilities, underscoring why the change is important for co-op members. Several committee members asked to be added as cosponsors during the hearing.
Public commenters from the cooperative and sustainability groups voiced support for the measure as a necessary step to manage SOS costs and to shield residential members from the financial risks of supplying extremely large new loads. Committee members did not take a formal vote on SB 276 during this session.
