Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Get Lifetime Access

Votes at a glance: council approves consent agenda, CDBG application, election date and grant submission

Pinetop Lakeside Town Council · April 17, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council unanimously approved the consent agenda, Resolution 26-1810 (CDBG application for community center renovation), Resolution 26-1811 (call for the Nov. 3, 2026 general election) and Resolution 26-1812 (authorize Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation grant submission). Individual roll-call tallies were not recorded in the transcript.

At the meeting the council handled several formal actions with unanimous approval and no roll-call tallies transcribed.

- Consent agenda: Vice Mayor moved to approve the consent agenda; the motion carried unanimously.

- Resolution 26-1810 (CDBG application for community center): Vice Mayor moved to approve the resolution authorizing submission of an FY26 CDBG application to fund the Pinetop Lakeside Community Center renovation; council approved unanimously. Staff noted the estimated project cost is just over $510,000 and said NACOG will confirm final allocations.

- Resolution 26-1811 (call for general election): Councilor Heisler moved to adopt Resolution 26-1811, calling the town’s general election for Nov. 3, 2026 and placing the required home-rule continuation question on the ballot in coordination with Navajo County; the motion carried unanimously.

- Resolution 26-1812 (Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation grant): Council adopted Resolution 26-1812 to authorize submission of an application for consideration through the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation 2026 Arizona Benefits Fund and to authorize the chief of police (or designee) to act on behalf of the town; the motion carried unanimously.

The meeting transcript records the outcomes as "carries unanimously" for these items; individual yes/no vote counts are not specified in the transcript and therefore are not reported here.