Committee debates tying new positions to revenue forecast, seeks clear triggers and JFC involvement
Loading...
Summary
Language sponsored by Senator Westman would create new positions on Aug. 15, 2026 only if the July revenue forecast is not lower than January's; committee members discussed exceptions, threshold triggers, and whether the Joint Fiscal Committee should be required to review larger rescissions.
Staff member introduced language that would delay creation of any new positions authorized this legislative session until Aug. 15, 2026, provided the July consensus revenue forecast is not lower than the forecast adopted in January. The provision was described as a mechanism to ensure positions are funded by a stable revenue outlook.
Committee members raised questions about scope and exceptions. Staff clarified that most pool and general position-creation sections would be affected but that two military positions funded predominantly by federal funds would not be subject to the contingency. Members debated how to define thresholds that would trigger Joint Fiscal Committee (JFC) involvement or administrative rescission and whether small forecast downgrades could be handled administratively.
“I would rather have the Joint Fiscal Committee that will meet with everybody here,” one committee member said, urging more formal review for larger downgrades. Another member suggested tying JFC involvement to a percentage threshold, so small changes could be handled by administration while larger declines would prompt committee review.
Staff and members agreed to draft clearer trigger language and to return a revised version at the next meeting; no formal vote took place on the contingent-creation language.
