Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Testing And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bremen school leaders outline testing and graduation-planning changes as state accountability shifts
Summary
District administrators told the Bremen Public Schools board that new iLearn-based accountability adds success factors (attendance, reading, growth and course-specific assessments), meaning schools can earn credit for student growth; the board was told the system will take years to normalize and may skew initial fall accountability results.
School administrators and board members at a Bremen Public Schools meeting discussed how new state accountability rules tied to iLearn assessments will affect school grades and student planning.
A presenter (Presenter (S1)) told the board that the updated system awards points for attendance, reading, growth and specific assessments, meaning “even if we have kids that come into us struggling and they're not hitting the passing mark, if our teachers are growing them, we can still receive some credit for that,” and described a district spreadsheet being used to target improvement efforts. The presenter said staff will have seventh-graders complete four‑year high‑school plans to capture graduation‑plan points.
The board asked about teachers’ experience using checkpoint data. The presenter said teachers became more comfortable comparing checkpoint results across the year and were better able to spot trends and prepare students for summative tests, adding that early pilot reports were difficult to interpret but that reports improved this year.
School administrator (School administrator (S5)) explained how the addition of an iLearn government test as a success factor will affect fall accountability: many seniors who graduated last year did not have the opportunity to take that assessment, so the district expects initial grades to be skewed and said the system will likely need a few years to normalize. “It’s gonna take a little bit of time to normalize,” S5 said, noting that some success‑factor counts come from tests taken in earlier grades and that the district is tracking those timing effects.
Board members characterized the first year of public reporting as effectively a 'year 0' while the district and state iron out rules and timelines; the chair asked for patience as staff continue to gather data and refine reporting. The board did not take formal action on accountability at the meeting. The district noted it will continue to report and refine data use practices to help teachers target supports.
The board also reviewed related operational items—including staffing updates and planning for next year—that the district said support implementation of the accountability changes.
