Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff rewrite animal-control ordinance; magistrates defer final vote for more review
Summary
Proposed revisions to Boyle County's animal-control ordinance add definitions (including dogfighting and torture), double impound fees, create livestock penalties ($100–$500 per occurrence), add leash/park rules and revise cruelty/vicious-dog language; the court withdrew a vote and scheduled a first reading after members requested the final packet and more time.
County staff presented comprehensive revisions to the county animal-control ordinance on Nov. 26, adding or clarifying definitions, penalties and administrative procedures and proposing several new enforcement tools.
Julie (county attorney/animal-control staff) walked the court through major changes: new definitions for dogfighting and cruelty, an expanded restraint section (with community cats exempt from leash requirements), impound fees raised to $50 (with a staff waiver option the first time), and livestock penalties set at $100 to $500 per occurrence. The draft also adds explicit language on vicious dogs — including a requirement that a vicious dog be kept behind a fence at least seven feet tall and that an owner be at least 21 to keep such a dog — and creates a staff checklist for enforcement.
Magistrates and Humane Society representatives discussed community-cat management, spay/neuter capacity and whether to ban sales of pets in parking lots or public places; Carrie Key of the Humane Society urged partnership and pointed to free spay/neuter services and targeted intake policies for injured or vulnerable animals. After questions and a request to circulate the final packet with page numbers, the court withdrew the motion to adopt the ordinance immediately and directed staff to present a first reading at the next meeting after additional review.
The proposed ordinance would also remove inspection authority over veterinary clinics, add graduated cruelty offenses consistent with state law, and require rabies-certificate documentation for dog licenses. Staff did not adopt a final local restriction on pet sales at the meeting; magistrates asked staff to research other municipalities’ approaches and to bring language back for consideration.
