Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facade Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
EDA removes façade priority map, sets $24,999 cap for grants
Summary
The Cottage Grove EDA voted to remove a priority map from its facade improvement program and to clarify the maximum award as $24,999 (below the business-subsidy threshold), a change intended to encourage more commercial applicants.
Get email alerts on the Facade Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its April 14 meeting the Cottage Grove Economic Development Authority approved changes to the façade improvement program that remove a previously used priority map and clarify the total project award cap as $24,999.
Nate, community development staff, told the board the program—started in 2019—has supported 12 projects totaling $284,000 in grant awards. He said the priority map has become, in his view, "more of a barrier" for interested businesses and recommended removing it so eligible commercial properties can apply regardless of map area. Nate also recommended stating the maximum award as $24,999 rather than advertising $25,000, noting the cap keeps awards below the business-subsidy reporting threshold.
Board members pressed for clarity on budget and prioritization. EDA member Kambata raised whether removing the map would increase demand and asked about an annual budget; Nate said the board set a $50,000 budget for 2026 and that awarding the current pipeline project could use the year's allocation. Board members discussed using zones as a prioritization factor (rather than an eligibility gate) and whether the program should move from rolling applications to fixed deadlines if applications increase.
The EDA moved to adopt the guideline changes; Kambata made the motion, Cheetah seconded it, and the motion carried on a voice vote.
What changed: the priority map will no longer be a strict eligibility barrier and the maximum grant is now explicitly capped at $24,999 to avoid triggering business subsidy reporting requirements. Staff can still recommend deadline or prioritization adjustments later if application volume rises.
Next steps: staff will continue to accept and review applications under the revised criteria and the board may amend the 2026 budget or adopt application deadlines if demand increases.

