Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Assisted Living topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council signals support for assisted‑living projects but asks for conditional‑use review and design changes

Dayton City Council · December 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council reviewed two assisted‑living concept plans (32‑unit and 58‑unit proposals); council favored allowing assisted living in GMU‑4 as a conditional use, raised fire‑access and height concerns for a proposed 3‑story building, and encouraged site changes to reduce neighborhood impacts.

The Dayton City Council reviewed two assisted‑living concept plans on Dec. 9 and generally indicated support for permitting assisted‑living and memory‑care uses in the GMU‑4 district, provided the use is handled as a conditional use so the council and planning commission can apply site‑specific conditions.

Staff told the council that assisted living is not currently a permitted use in GMU‑4 and that an ordinance amendment (or conditional‑use approach) would be necessary. The first concept — a one‑floor, 32‑unit SuiteLiving project with assisted living and memory care — drew questions about operations, transports and emergency response; the developer said rooms would accommodate couples and that the facility would accept elderly‑waiver and Medicare‑type payments and use Transit Link for resident transport.

A second, larger concept proposed a three‑story, 58‑unit building with underground parking. Councilmembers expressed reservations about a three‑story building so close to existing single‑family homes, potential fire department access to higher floors, and visual impacts; several members preferred lowering or stepping the building or shifting its footprint. Staff and developers discussed site plan options, fire‑lane access, elevator and stair requirements, and landscape buffering.

Council indicated a preference to allow assisted living in GMU‑4 as a conditional use (which would let the city add mitigation conditions) and generally favored the L‑shaped concept for the smaller facility to preserve expansion options and break up massing. Staff will return with ordinance and site‑plan details as applicants refine designs.