Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ballot Initiatives topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council declines to adopt Unite Here initiative ordinances outright; lengthy debate centers on economic and legal concerns
Summary
Council members declined to adopt two Unite Here Local 11 measures as city ordinances during the meeting (motions to adopt did not pass), leaving the measures to proceed to the ballot. Staff raised jurisdictional and constitutional concerns and warned of market distortion if Ontario-specific rules are imposed.
The council considered two initiative measures circulated by Unite Here Local 11 — a measure addressing hotel-worker protections, retention and minimum wages and a separate measure that would require voter approval for major hotel and event-center projects. Staff presented legal and policy concerns about applying the measures to Ontario only, possible conflicts with federal or state oversight (examples cited included airport operations) and practical burdens on the city to administer record-keeping, enforcement and potential waiver processes.
During public comment more than a dozen speakers from hotel owners, construction and firefighting unions, hospitality industry groups and hotel employees debated economic impact, worker safety and democracy. Hotel owners and industry representatives repeatedly warned the measures would drive developers and conventions away, reduce transient-occupancy tax revenue and complicate redevelopment of older, high-call-volume properties. Labor representatives and workers urged adoption, saying the initiatives reflected resident support and necessary protections for employees.
Council debate focused on legal risk, economic competitiveness and whether the council should place the measures directly into city code or allow voters to decide. The transcript shows a motion to approve one of the measures to place it before the council as adoption was moved and considered; that motion did not pass by the end of the discussion (the record indicates the council did not adopt the initiatives as ordinances at this meeting). The council instead moved forward with scheduling a March special election so voters can decide the measures.
What happens next: Because council did not adopt the measures as city ordinances at this meeting, the measures will appear on the March 24, 2026 special election ballot as scheduled. Staff flagged potential legal vulnerabilities that could lead to litigation if the measures pass; council and staff said they would review options and funding for any required administrative actions if voters approve the initiatives.
Attribution: Quotations and attributions are drawn from the transcript of public comment and staff presentation.
