Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Recreation Impact Fee topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mount Pleasant delays decision on including Contoy Arena in recreation impact-fee study

Mount Pleasant City Council · March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sunrise Engineering will return with financial comparison data before the Mount Pleasant City Council decides whether to include the Contoy Arena in a recreation impact-fee study; councilors asked staff to arrange a follow-up meeting with city contacts.

Ben Coray, a Sunrise Engineering representative, updated the Mount Pleasant City Council on the city's recreation impact-fee study and said Sunrise will present additional financial comparisons before the council decides whether to include the Contoy Arena in the fee base.

The decision to defer came after councilors discussed how including the arena could alter the study's calculations and potential fee amounts. Councilman Rondy G. Black and other members expressed interest in seeing comparison data and background analysis before taking a position.

Sunrise Engineering will return with the requested comparison data, and Ben Coray said he will coordinate a follow-up meeting with city staff members Stephanie Blain and Justin Atkinson to review the analysis. No formal motion or vote occurred at the work session.

The next scheduled step is the presentation of the financial analysis at a future meeting so the council can consider whether the Contoy Arena should be part of the impact-fee methodology.