Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fairway Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reconsiders Fairway site access; engineers and staff cite median and roundabout work as safety mitigations
Summary
Fairway representatives returned to the commission April 16 to ask that a prior condition barring a 'right out' be revisited; engineers and the city administrator said a median and roundabout work make a closer access acceptable, though commissioners raised sight-distance and U‑turn concerns and expressed mixed views.
Representatives for Fairway asked the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 16 to reconsider a prior condition that would prevent a 'right-out' from a planned access until a nearby roundabout is finished. Kobe Pritchard, speaking for Fairway, said the company would prefer the option for a right-out for full operational flexibility. “We can put signage up, police it all we want, we'd like to have the right out just for full purposes,” he said.
Why it matters: The access decision affects traffic flow and safety around Holly Boulevard and adjacent neighborhoods; commissioners weighed sight-distance, potential U‑turns, and whether the added access would merely feed a small neighborhood or alleviate congestion at a choke point.
Engineering and staff views City and project engineers said prior corridor studies and design work considered the roundabout and the proposed driveway locations. City administrator Ryan Reed and engineering staff told the commission that extending the median past the driveway was a planned mitigation that allows the driveway to be located closer than the standard 300-foot spacing in the engineering ordinance. Reed said the median modification "solves that problem" by limiting conflict points and helping sight lines; staff also said a no‑U‑turn designation could be posted to discourage risky maneuvers.
Commission response and concerns Several commissioners voiced concerns about sight-distance at the north access point (where drivers would look past trees and parked cars toward traffic coming around a roundabout) and about drivers making U‑turns if the right-out forced them to travel to another intersection. One commissioner said the right-in is acceptable but questioned the value of a right-out that primarily serves a small adjacent neighborhood. The city’s police chief and engineering staff were reported as not being “concerned” in their reviews, but the commission explored conditions and signage options.
Status and next steps Fairway provided a memo from the director of engineering services and the developer’s design team answered commissioners’ questions; the exchange in the transcript ends with continued discussion and no final vote recorded in the provided excerpt. The commission will retain the record for further consideration and may place conditions on driveway width, signage, and timing tied to completion of the roundabout.
