Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nuclear Survey topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bannock County commissioners authorize resident survey on nuclear opportunities after debate over outreach and representativeness
Summary
After a lengthy debate over whether digital outreach would yield a representative sample, the commission authorized a county-led resident survey to gauge interest in nuclear-related opportunities (supply-chain work or small modular reactors); staff will publish the survey and return results to the commission.
The commission discussed a proposed county survey to "take the temperature" of residents about potential nuclear-related activity in Bannock County — ranging from supply-chain opportunities to the possibility of hosting small modular reactors — following a site survey and heat map prepared by Idaho National Laboratory (INL).
"They have done a site survey... and we're a good fit," the chair said, summarizing the lab's initial work and the commission’s request to solicit resident feedback.
Planning and outreach staff recommended low-cost digital distribution (press release, social media, partner email lists and a website pop-up) to reach residents and said the county’s digital tools had increased public input from roughly 1% to an estimated 5–7% of the population compared with previous outreach. Tristan Borgwin, assistant planning director, said targeted mailers or every-door direct mail could improve reach but would require additional budget.
Commissioners debated whether INL should provide funds for broader mail distribution and whether an electronic survey would be sufficiently representative. One commissioner cautioned: "I have studied surveys my whole life, analytically... a poor survey is not much better than no survey at all," and warned that biased results could be exploited by highly motivated groups. Another commissioner argued that a quick, low-cost digital survey would still provide useful directional information and that the county is not committing to any project by asking residents.
After discussion the board moved and approved a motion to distribute the survey using county channels and partner outreach, with a two-week proposed response window and staff returning to present results to the commission on the record. Commissioners directed staff to plan follow-up community open houses depending on survey results and to be transparent about distribution methods and limitations.
