Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Executive Session Litigation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council holds executive session on UPF Litigation; motions to enter and exit recorded as unanimous

Chesterfield County Council · April 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Pursuant to S.C. Code § 30-4-70(a)(2), Chesterfield County Council entered executive session to discuss negotiations and legal advice concerning UPF Litigation; motions to enter and to exit the closed session were both approved unanimously.

Coleman R. Bryant, county attorney, advised the council that pursuant to S.C. Code § 30-4-70(a)(2) the council would enter executive session to discuss negotiations incident to proposed contractual agreements and to receive legal advice relating to UPF Litigation. Council Member Ethan Foard moved to enter executive session and Council Member Brandon Price seconded; the motion passed with unanimous support.

After the closed session, Council Member Brandon Price moved to exit executive session; Vice-Chair Todd Smallwood seconded and the motion again passed unanimously. The public briefing record contains no disclosure of the substance of the executive-session discussion, consistent with the cited statutory authority.

Following the executive session, Chair Mary D. Anderson announced there were no further items and adjourned the briefing.