Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Forces topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisor Fielder presses Mayor Lurie for plan to protect civil liberties if federal forces deploy to San Francisco
Summary
After recent media reports that the U.S. president might send the National Guard to San Francisco, Supervisor Fielder won an 8‑vote motion to ask an unscheduled question and pressed Mayor Daniel Lurie on the administration's preparations; the mayor said the city is coordinating across departments and reaffirmed policies restricting local participation in federal immigration enforcement.
Supervisor Fielder invoked a rarely used board privilege and asked for — and won — permission to ask an unscheduled question after media reports that President Trump had suggested sending the National Guard to San Francisco. The motion to allow the question carried (10–0) after the board confirmed the procedural threshold. Fielder warned that the city had to be prepared for a sudden federal deployment and said residents, particularly people of color and immigrants, deserved an explanation on how the city would defend their rights.
"As a sanctuary city, I believe San Franciscans are owed a statement from our mayor on the record about how the mayor's administration is preparing to defend their civil liberties and rights," Fielder said, asking what direction the mayor had given to relevant departments "in the event that Donald Trump sends militarized federal forces, including potentially the National Guard, to San Francisco." The question followed reporting that the president had publicly committed to deploying federal forces to U.S. cities.
Mayor Daniel Lurie told the board his office has been monitoring the possibility of federal intervention since he took office and has convened a cross‑departmental policy group of public safety leaders, the city attorney's office and affected department heads to coordinate the city's response. "Keeping San Francisco safe is my number one priority," Lurie said, adding that the group meets regularly and that a meeting had concluded about an hour before the board session.
Lurie cited a city attorney brief filed in the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that local law enforcement is best positioned to keep communities safe and noted existing SFPD policy "which interim Chief Yep reaffirmed recently ... governs engagement with federal authorities and ensures SFPD officers have clear guidance." He said that policy "prohibits SFPD from participating in federal civil immigration enforcement" and that it is not the role of local law enforcement to "assist with military operations on our streets." Lurie also said his administration is in regular communication with immigrant and community leaders and would continue to coordinate operational plans.
The exchange did not produce a new, board‑level directive; Fielder said she was seeking assurance the administration is prepared and able to defend civil liberties should a deployment occur. The board took no formal vote beyond the procedural motion to allow the question.
