Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Human Resources topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Substitutes urge board to reclassify permanent building substitutes as contracted staff

Spotsylvania County School Board · February 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two building substitutes told the board that permanent substitutes should be reclassified as 10‑month contracted positions to improve retention and provide paid leave protections; the superintendent said staff would bring back the previous presentation and background for the new board to review.

During public comment, two building substitutes from Smith Station Elementary urged the Spotsylvania County School Board to study reclassifying permanent building substitutes as contracted 10‑month employees.

Tammy Micklus described a personal medical emergency involving her adult daughter and said she lost her building substitute assignment after exceeding the division's absence limit for noncontracted substitutes. "Building substitutes do just as much, if not more, than paraprofessionals," she told the board, and she asked officials to "consider the human cost of these policies."

Logan Young, who identified himself as a permanent building substitute, asked the board to consider models used by other Virginia divisions and requested the division study a move to a 10‑month contracted role for permanent substitutes. He said contracting the position would improve retention, reduce last‑minute staffing disruptions, and provide greater continuity for students.

Board members acknowledged the request. Superintendent Clint Mitchell said the presentation on this topic exists in district records and staff can bring it back for the board's review. The chair confirmed staff would provide the information to the new board for consideration.

What's next: The board did not change policy at the meeting but directed staff to return with the prior presentation and supporting data so members can consider options for reclassification and possible in‑house versus vendor cost comparisons.