Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Climate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears Cedar Forest climate survey; member urges third-party probe amid abuse claims
Summary
Superintendent presented Virginia Climate Survey results showing Cedar Forest Elementary generally above division and state averages, and concluded the data do not substantiate a third-party investigation; board member Lisa Phelps urged such an investigation and alleged instances of child abuse and retaliation, prompting rebuttals and requests for further review and divisionwide data.
Superintendent Dr. Mitchell presented the Virginia Climate Survey results for Cedar Forest Elementary on the board's request and told the Spotsylvania County School Board the school'level data largely exceeded division, regional and state averages across several measures of classroom and staff climate.
The presentation said 62 classroom instructors and 26 support staff completed the survey at Cedar Forest and highlighted higher-than-average scores for classroom instructor climate (about 5.0 on a 1-to-7 scale) and student climate, as well as relatively high staff perceptions of safety and the relationship with the school resource officer. The superintendent said professional-growth opportunities scored lower (3.9 vs. state 4.7) and identified that as an area for improvement.
"After analyzing that data over the last couple of weeks, I have no reason to substantiate the fact that there needs to be a third-party investigation at Cedar Forest because the data does not tell me that," Dr. Mitchell said during the presentation.
Board member Phelps responded with an extended, emotional statement calling for a third-party investigation into alleged child abuse and staff retaliation at Cedar Forest. "Not one more child is going to be abused under my watch," Phelps said, claiming teachers who reported abuse were targeted and questioning prior accountability measures.
Several board members pushed back on the implication that the survey or the division hid substantiated abuse. Board member Dr. Carol Medawar said teachers are mandatory reporters and insisted that allegations brought to the division had been handled. "If we see abuse, we report it," Medawar said. She called the survey a valuable, anonymous data point and said she had no reason to believe an exaggerated problem exists at the school based on the current evidence.
Other board members and staff noted the survey's timing and administration window. A staff presenter said the survey opened in January and typically remains open four to six weeks; Dr. Mitchell and another staff member explained that results require participation above a 50% threshold to be considered statistically reportable. Board members asked for and were promised a divisionwide overview of climate survey results at an upcoming meeting.
The superintendent emphasized that the presentation was meant to inform the board's next steps: "I'm going back to what I said on that dais to the public, which is I'm going to look at that survey result and make a determination and a recommendation to the board based on that result." No formal vote was taken on opening an independent investigation during the meeting.
The board heard public and member comments urging continued attention to staff professional development, mental-health supports and accountability processes. Dr. Medawar and others said the survey should be one of several measures the district uses to determine follow-up actions. The board directed staff to present divisionwide climate data and follow-up recommendations in a future meeting.
