Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enrollment Projections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant projects modest enrollment decline; board weighs citizen task force and financial scenarios
Summary
A consultant study presented to the Shorewood School District projects a resident-enrollment decline of about 90 students by 2040 and shows substantial excess building capacity; the board discussed forming a citizen task force to evaluate school configurations and the financial implications tied to an operating referendum.
Consultant Mark Roffers told the Shorewood School District board on Sept. 24 that the district's resident enrollment is projected to decline by about 90 students by 2040.
"So we are projecting, in terms of total enrollment in the district, decrease of about 90, students," Roffers said during a presentation that modeled births, housing changes and student-per-housing-unit yields across 34 neighborhood zones.
Roffers explained the methodology behind the projections: neighborhood-level student-per-unit ratios derived from district records, anticipated housing growth vetted with the village planner, and an assumption that open-enrollment flows remain constant. He said single-family home sales yield the highest student generation (roughly one student per two homes sold), while newer multifamily developments produce far fewer students (roughly one student per 10'1 units in the baseline scenarios).
The consultant compared those projections with facility capacity figures prepared earlier by an architectural study, noting that, under resident-only assumptions, the district's two elementary schools combined could show roughly 500 students of excess potential capacity by 2040, the intermediate school about 260 and the high school about 290.
Superintendent Lori Burgos and board members used the presentation to frame possible next steps. Burgos said staff will return with a "do-nothing" financial projection and that the board needs clearer task-force parameters—such as financial targets or limits—before recruiting members. Burgos noted the district's current operating referendum expires in 2028 and suggested that the amount tied to any future referendum would be an important parameter for the task force.
Board members asked about the sensitivity of the model to housing scenarios and demographic assumptions. Roffers said the largest wild card is birth-rate assumptions; he also noted that the study accounts for village-planned housing and that simply adding the projected 300 new housing units over time would not materially change the overall downward trajectory.
Several members raised policy and finance questions the task force should consider, including whether to prioritize keeping four school facilities open, what enrollment levels must be maintained to sustain current programming, and how a future operating referendum might need to change to stabilize budgets.
Roffers recommended a citizen task force as a next step, staffed to run roughly a six-month review of options and criteria. "Any option should minimize impacts on students," he said, and the board would set the task force's parameters in advance.
What happens next: district staff will prepare additional financial scenarios (including the status-quo "do nothing" projection) and a proposed charge and meeting commitment for the task force to discuss at an upcoming board meeting; the board signaled interest in recruiting residents only after clarifying the task force's scope and financial constraints.
