Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gainesville council adopts ordinance amending FY2025-26 appropriations, proposes higher tax rate
Summary
On Oct. 21 the Gainesville City Council adopted an ordinance amending appropriations for FY2025-26 and approved a proposed tax rate of 0.573779 per $100 valuation; the city says the median homeowner would pay about $68.54 more annually under the proposal.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Gainesville City Council on Oct. 21 approved an ordinance amending appropriations for the 2025–26 fiscal year and adopted a proposed tax rate of 0.573779 per $100 valuation, which the city’s taxpayer-impact statement says would raise the typical Gainesville homeowner’s annual property tax bill by about $68.54.
Mayor Pro Tem Mary Jo Dollar moved to suspend the charter to allow immediate consideration of the budget ordinance; Councilmember Dakota Nichols seconded the motion, which the council approved 7-0. Dollar then moved to adopt the ordinance amending appropriations; Nichols seconded and the measure carried by a 7-0 vote.
The agenda included the Taxpayer Impact Statement prepared under HB 1522. The statement lists a median home value of $180,000 on the 2025 certified roll, the current adopted tax rate of 0.535700 per $100 valuation, and the no-new-revenue rate of 0.515430 per $100. The city’s comparison table shows the current fiscal-year tax bill for a median-valued Gainesville homestead at $964.26, the proposed FY2025-26 bill at $1,032.80, and a balanced budget at the no-new-revenue rate at $927.77.
According to the materials presented, the proposed budget would increase the median homeowner’s annual tax by about $68.54 compared with the current fiscal year; the city notes that adopting a no-new-revenue budget would have reduced that same homeowner’s bill by about $36.49. The ordinance text and effective date were part of the meeting packet; the minutes record the approval but do not specify a separate effective-on date beyond the ordinance adoption.
The council completed the item and then adjourned; no formal amendments to the ordinance were recorded in the minutes.
