Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves staff stipulations for 122 Potomac after discussion and consent pull
Summary
After a commissioner pulled 122 Potomac from the consent agenda for questions about building condition and window changes, the board reviewed staff recommendations and voted to approve the staff stipulations unanimously, directing staff to continue monitoring and to work with the owner.
The Compliance and Technical Advisory Board approved staff's recommended stipulations for the consent-item voicemail received regarding 122 Potomac following a brief discussion and a motion to pull the item for comment.
Lucen Tuntua, identified as president of the Commission of Review for Dignathy Hill, had told the board she agreed with staff recommendations but asked that exterior window changes be limited so replacements remain single-pane to match historic character. Commissioner Corey asked to remove the item from consent because the applicant was not present and commissioners had substantive questions about the building's deteriorated condition and whether proposed work would constitute a violation.
Staff told the board that the existing window was not a known code violation unless it were modified, that staff could assist the new owner, and that the case could be deferred to February or partially approved depending on submitted details. After discussion, a commissioner moved to approve the staff recommendations and stipulations; the motion was seconded and passed on a roll-call vote with all present members recorded as voting yes.
The board recorded that certificates of appropriateness, if approved, do not replace required municipal permits and that any work may not begin until the relevant permits are issued by the Office of Historic Preservation. The board asked staff to follow up with the applicant to clarify timelines and specifics before final permitting.
