Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

DMHC outlines menopause coverage mandate and PBM oversight; lawmakers, providers and industry offer feedback

Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Health · April 20, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Department of Managed Health Care presented several budget change proposals and trailer‑bill items including a menopause coverage mandate with outreach funding and expanded PBM licensing and enforcement under AB116/SB41; medical groups and drugmakers offered implementation concerns and wording suggestions.

The Department of Managed Health Care described multiple proposals intended to expand consumer protections and oversight.

DMHC staff presented a menopause proposal that would require plans to cover FDA‑approved menopause treatments when medically necessary, provide annual menopause assessments for enrollees age 40 and older, biannual notices to enrollees and providers, and support provider education; the proposal includes $3 million for a state outreach campaign and staffing for implementation with a proposed effective date in 2027 for contract changes.

DMHC staff also outlined PBM licensing and enforcement under AB116 (licensure, quarterly financial statements, audit authority) and follow‑on reforms in SB41 that would restrict spread pricing, require manufacturer rebates to pass to plans and limit allowable administrative fees, along with compliance guidance and data collection duties for the department. The department described resource requests (positions and funding) to implement licensure reviews, financial oversight, legal enforcement and medical survey updates; timelines in testimony referenced licensure dates starting in 2027.

Members and stakeholders broadly supported improving menopause access and PBM oversight but raised implementation concerns. The California Medical Association and specialty societies requested attention to provider impacts and technical language; industry commenters (Bayer) supported coverage but urged language to allow access to new therapies; consumer advocates urged equity protections so Medi‑Cal enrollees are not treated differently. Patient and provider advocates urged DMHC to ensure adequate staffing and guidance for providers and pharmacies during rollout.

Public comment also included calls for continued funding of an existing health IT workforce program and reauthorization of $15 million for wraparound services for sickle cell patients; the subcommittee closed the hearing without votes.