Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Votes at a glance: council approves gas right‑of‑entry ordinance, Boise Creek Cove final plat and Safe Streets plan
Loading...
Summary
On March 9 the council approved Ordinance 2835 (right‑of‑entry for gas inspection), Resolution 1869 (Boise Creek Cove final plat, 18 lots) and Resolution 1870 (local road safety plan). All measures passed by voice vote with no recorded opposition; council also authorized up to $25,000 for consultant work on Title 15 amendments.
The Uniontown City Council took several formal actions at its March 9 meeting.
Ordinance 2835 — Right‑of‑entry for gas inspection: The city read Ordinance 2835 by title, which amends the municipal code to authorize city access to inspect buildings in which natural gas is supplied and to provide remedies if inspections are refused. Staff recommended approval. The council approved the ordinance by voice vote with no opposition.
Resolution 1869 — Boise Creek Cove final plat: Planning Director Chris Besany recommended approval of the Boise Creek Cove final plat, an 18‑lot subdivision on a parcel of just under 10 acres with required infrastructure installed and bonds posted. The council passed Resolution 1869 by voice vote, approving the final plat subject to the conditions already provided in the staff analysis and prior preliminary approvals.
Resolution 1870 — Local Road Safety Plan (Safe Streets): Staff presented a local road safety plan identifying nine project areas with an estimated total of about $21,000,000 for spot and systematic countermeasures (LED lighting, striping, rumble strips, pedestrian improvements, flashing crosswalk enhancements). Council adopted the resolution by voice vote to allow the city to pursue grants and loans for implementation.
Consultant authorization: Council authorized the administration to contract with an outside consultant for Title 15 amendments not to exceed $25,000 to comply with state law; the motion passed by voice vote.
Votes: All items were approved by council voice vote; the clerk recorded no roll‑call tallies in the transcript. The meeting record indicates no councilmember voiced opposition during the votes.
