Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
El Cerrito council revises meeting rules for remote participation and public comment; vote splits on process language
Summary
After months of subcommittee work and SB 707 implementation, the council adopted updated rules of procedure clarifying teleconferencing safeguards, decorum, and an optional structured approach to limiting public-comment time; the council debated whether members should be allowed to respond to commenters and adopted compromise language on staff follow-up with a narrow majority.
The City Council considered and adopted updated council rules and procedures intended to implement SB 707, clarify remote‑participation safeguards, and provide structured options for managing public comment.
City Clerk Holly Charlotte said the proposed revisions reorganize the document, align it with SB 707 teleconferencing requirements, add decorum and anti‑harassment language, and include an optional process for shortening public-comment time in order to ensure the council can conduct its business while maintaining robust public input. (Holly Charlotte)
Council discussion focused on a provision that originally read "council members shall not respond to comments by members of the public." Mayor Pro Tem Saltzman and others sought flexibility to allow brief, empathetic responses in limited circumstances. The council reached compromise language: "Council members will not generally respond to comments by members of the public." The council also added a clarifying paragraph that "after any public comment, council members may request staff to address or follow‑up on a concern, question, or request heard by a member of the public." (Council debate)
On the mechanics of limiting public comment, the subcommittee explained a 'waterfall' approach that ties total available comment time to the number of speakers so the mayor has non-arbitrary guidance for time limits while retaining discretion. Several council members warned that certain caps could inadvertently prevent speakers from being heard, and the adopted version preserved mayoral discretion while providing a default framework.
Why it matters: The rules govern how council meetings operate and how the public can participate, balancing free public expression with the council’s ability to transact business and comply with the Brown Act and SB 707. The clarifications aim to reduce arbitrary enforcement of time limits and to provide staff and the mayor clearer options while protecting staff and participants from harassment.
Vote: A motion to adopt the revised rules (with the compromise language on responses and staff follow-up) carried by roll call with one recorded no vote by Mayor Pro Tem Saltzman; the council also directed staff to form an ad hoc committee to discuss SB 707 implications for subsidiary advisory bodies.
