Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission opts to keep case-by-case review for roof heights, approves code housekeeping on state statute references
Summary
After substantial debate, the commission rejected a proposed change to remove conditional use review for taller roof heights and instead approved a separate housekeeping amendment mapping prior state-code references to the updated Utah Code Title 17, chapter 79.
During consideration of ordinance 2026-09, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered two related items: whether to remove conditional use permit (CUP) review for buildings above standard roof heights and whether to add a single clause reconciling internal ordinance references to the state code renumbering.
Staff and the county attorney outlined trade-offs. Counsel noted CUPs carry litigation risk and require defensible findings if denied, while a fixed permitted height simplifies administration but can be inflexible given the county’s varied topography and public-safety considerations. Commissioners debated potential liability, mountain-area character and the benefit of site-specific review.
After discussion, a motion was moved and seconded to not recommend approval of the proposed change that would remove CUPs for taller roofs (effectively leaving the CUP option in place). The voice vote carried. Later in the same item the commission separately approved language to treat existing references to Utah Code Title 17 chapter 27A as references to Utah Code Title 17 chapter 79 (a renumbering/housekeeping change), which staff said would avoid repeated codifier edits across multiple ordinance sections.
Outcome: the commission elected to retain the CUP process for exceptional height requests (to permit case-by-case findings and site-specific mitigation) and approved the code-reference housekeeping amendment for state statute renumbering. The roof-height policy question remains for possible future ordinance drafting.
Next steps: staff will not forward the proposed height-change language as written; it will proceed with the code-reference housekeeping amendment to replace state-code cross-references.
