Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building And Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Pinewoods Resort roof extension to 49 feet, requires fire-suppression conditions
Summary
The King County Planning and Zoning Commission approved a commercial conditional use permit allowing Pinewoods Resort to raise a building roof to 49 feet, subject to required fire-suppression measures and any wildfire-defensible-space mitigations recommended by the fire official.
The King County Planning and Zoning Commission voted to approve a commercial conditional use permit to extend the roof peak of a Pinewoods Resort building to 49 feet on Lot 51-168, following a staff report and applicant presentation.
Brent Moser, the applicant, told the commission he recently acquired portions of Pinewoods Resort and the onsite restaurant and plans to remodel to provide taller ceilings for meeting spaces and greater dining areas while converting some RV facilities toward lodging. Moser said the roof increase is driven by roofline and snow-shedding needs rather than adding additional stories.
Staff reported that the county’s standard height limit is 35 feet and that the building official advised a 49-foot structure would require a fire-suppression sprinkler system. The fire chief, Forrest Bernard, provided a letter saying the fire department’s apparatus could reach the proposed height, but staff noted that defensible-space/WUI mitigation could require removal of some trees.
Commissioners questioned whether neighbors are notified for CUPs and were told conditional use permits are administrative and do not require neighbor notification or public comment; several commissioners pressed the board on precedent and visual impacts, noting this site is largely surrounded by tall trees that obscure sightlines.
A commissioner moved to approve the commercial conditional use permit based on the application materials and findings, subject to all applicable conditions, including the required sprinkler system; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.
The action preserves the commission’s ability to consider site-specific mitigation (for example, requiring sprinklers or defensible-space work) while allowing the applicant to proceed with the proposed remodel. The commission did not take public comment on this item because the CUP process is administrative.
Next steps: staff will incorporate the conditions into the permit paperwork and notify the applicant of any required fire-suppression or WUI mitigation measures.
