Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Accounting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel narrows revenue-classification bill; background-check fees treated as pass-through
Summary
Lawmakers adopted amendments to Senate Bill 42 that narrow which receipts count as 'damage awards' for accounting and classify certain background-check fees and aviation fuel taxes as pass-through collections for another government.
The Senate Appropriations Committee on Monday approved amendments to Senate Bill 42 that narrow several definitions used for state accounting and clarify that some collections are pass-throughs to other governments.
Senator Weissman, speaking for the sponsors, said the amendment L4 removes language that would have required the Department of Public Safety to build new IT systems to capture specific data points, a change aimed at eliminating potentially costly requirements. “Turns out their information systems are pretty particular in terms of what they can and can’t track,” Weissman said, and L4 strikes remaining language that would have asked DPS to undertake IT development that could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Weissman also explained that L4 identifies specific revenue streams — including victim compensation funds and certain Highway User Tax Fund (HUTF) items — that should be classified as damage awards and, in some cases, allocated directly for state patrol road-safety purposes instead of flowing through the usual HUTF formula. The amendment also treats some background-check fees collected by CBI that are remitted to the FBI as collections for another government.
Committee members adopted L4 and J1 by voice and then passed the bill on a 4–3 vote. Sponsors said the narrowed approach is intended to make accounting treatment more transparent for budgeting and to avoid imposing new IT costs on agencies.
