Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
House subcommittee hearing presses for national robotics strategy to boost manufacturing and security
Loading...
Summary
Lawmakers and industry witnesses at a House Science subcommittee hearing urged a coordinated federal robotics strategy — including a national commission, state centers of excellence, and incentives — to shore up U.S. manufacturing, workforce training and supply-chain resilience amid growing competition from China.
Chair Sherbin Oberonolte opened the Subcommittee on Research and Technology hearing titled "Robots Made in America: Advancing U.S. Leadership in Manufacturing and Automation," saying the United States must act decisively to remain competitive as artificial intelligence and robotics converge.
"Physical AI could unleash a robotics renaissance, and America must remain at the forefront," Oberonolte said in his opening remarks, framing a national strategy as central to industry and national-security interests.
Why it matters: witnesses and bipartisan members repeatedly said a patchwork of agency efforts is insufficient for the scale of the challenge. Industry leaders urged Congress to pass legislation creating a national commission on robotics and to consider a central government robotics coordinator to align research, standards, workforce development and procurement.
Evan Beard, cofounder and CEO of StandardBots, told the panel that the U.S. needs a national strategy and outlined a four-part plan: build American-made robots, establish a center of robotics and manufacturing excellence in every state, expand workforce training, and defend American manufacturing from foreign market manipulation. "We need a national robotics strategy," Beard said.
Jeff Bernstein, president of the Association for Advancing Automation, urged coordinated federal action and listed six priorities that include a central government robotics office, tax incentives to drive adoption, and government-led workforce training. Bernstein also recommended that agencies act as early adopters to spur civilian demand.
Dr. Susan Helper, professor of economics at Case Western Reserve University, emphasized deployment choices: "Worker centered automation is not a constraint on competitiveness. It is a strategy for competitiveness." She recommended co-design grants that bring engineers, manufacturers and labor together and suggested expanding testbeds and funding for community-of-practice centers.
On legislation: witnesses and members referenced HR 7334, the National Commission on Robotics Act, as a vehicle to evaluate U.S. competitiveness and coordinate policy recommendations. "If we could coordinate across all agencies of government, that would have tremendous value," Bernstein said when asked about the commission's purpose.
Practical steps discussed included reworking the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) into better-resourced centers of excellence, offering tax and procurement incentives to speed adoption by small and medium manufacturers, and funding regional test beds for co-design and training.
What’s next: the subcommittee left the record open for 10 days for additional comments and written questions and adjourned. Members signaled continued interest in moving legislation and securing sustained funding for centers and workforce programs.
