Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Edgerton awards Washington Street reconstruction to RT Fox after closed‑session review of bid issues
Summary
After a closed‑session discussion under Wis. Stat. § 19.85(1)(g) about bid issues on the Washington Street Project, the council accepted the City Engineer's recommendation to award the reconstruction contract to RT Fox, citing responsiveness concerns about the low bidder BKS; the motion passed 6–0.
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Edgerton Common Council voted March 2 to award the Washington Street reconstruction contract to RT Fox following a closed‑session review of bid issues.
Earlier in the meeting the council authorized entering closed session under Wis. Stat. § 19.85(1)(g) to "confer with legal counsel for the governmental body who is rendering oral or written advice concerning strategy to be adopted by the body with respect to litigation in which it is or is likely to become involved," specifically citing consideration of bid issues on the Washington Street Project. The motion to enter closed session was made by Candy Davis and seconded by Shawn Prebil and passed on a 6–0 roll call vote.
After returning to open session on a motion by Shawn Prebil (second Candy Davis), the council, on a Tim Shaw motion seconded by Jim Burdick, accepted the City Engineer's recommendation to award the Washington Street reconstruction project to RT Fox. The minutes record two stated reasons for that decision: RT Fox was the only fully responsive bidder among four submissions, and prior experience with the low bidder, BKS, indicated the firm had been consistently behind schedule on earlier city projects and had exhibited communication and reliability problems. The motion passed on a 6–0 roll call vote.
The minutes state the council considered responsiveness and contractor reliability in selecting the "lowest responsible bidder." The record does not include the RT Fox bid amount, the amounts of the other bids, contract start/completion dates, or whether the city will pursue additional remedies related to any procurement irregularities.
