Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Drainage Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves Resolution No. 25-1208-6 to authorize LOSA with TxDOT for CDBG-MIT drainage project

Lexington City Council · December 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Lexington City Council approved Resolution No. 25-1208-6 authorizing execution of a Local On System Improvement Project Agreement (LOSA) with the Texas Department of Transportation for the city's CDBG-MIT Drainage Improvement Project; the minutes record the motion passed with a 3-for vote.

At its Dec. 8, 2025 regular meeting, the Lexington City Council voted to adopt Resolution No. 25-1208-6 authorizing the execution of a Local On System Improvement Project Agreement (LOSA) with the Texas Department of Transportation for the City of Lexington CDBG-MIT Drainage Improvement Project.

Councilmember David Mason made the motion to approve the resolution; Councilmember Anthony Retzlaff seconded. The minutes record the motion passed with a vote of "3 for." The minutes do not list individual roll-call votes or explain why four elected officials were listed as present while the recorded tally was three votes in favor.

The resolution directs the mayor or authorized city official to execute the LOSA with TxDOT, enabling the city to participate in the drain-age improvement project funded through the Community Development Block Grant-Mitigation (CDBG-MIT) program. No additional project details, budget amounts, or implementation timelines are included in the minutes.

The council did not record substantive public comment or debate on the resolution in the minutes. The item is recorded in the official minutes as Resolution No. 25-1208-6.

Next steps: the minutes indicate authorization to execute the agreement; the record does not specify a staff assignee, contract amount, or projected construction schedule.