Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Drain Report Resolutions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board accepts 2025 Drain Report and adopts resolutions honoring three longtime county servants

Sanilac County Board of Commissioners · April 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Drain Commissioner Doug Sweet presented the 2025 Annual Drain Report, which the board accepted. The board also adopted resolutions honoring Dawn Cubitt (30+ years), Rick Mitchell (33+ years) and Edward Pfaff (50+ years) of local public service, all by unanimous roll call.

Sanilac County's Drain Commissioner presented the 2025 Annual Drain Report and the Board of Commissioners accepted it April 7.

Doug Sweet presented the report to the board; the acceptance motion (NFA-006-26) was moved by Commissioner Roger Ballard and seconded by Commissioner Christine Lee and carried. The minutes record no substantive debate on the acceptance; the motion approved the report "as presented."

Separately, the board adopted resolutions honoring three longtime county-affiliated public servants. The board passed a resolution honoring Dawn Cubitt for more than 30 years of service—noting her start with the Sanilac County Sheriff’s Office on March 24, 1996, and later promotion to Central Dispatch Director in 2003—and expressed appreciation for her leadership and service. A roll call for the Cubitt resolution recorded all members voting yes.

The board also adopted resolutions recognizing Rick Mitchell for over 33 years as Maple Valley Township Supervisor and Edward Pfaff for more than 50 years of service as Argyle Township Clerk; both resolutions were adopted by unanimous roll call. The minutes record the board's intent to present the resolutions to the honorees and enter them into the official proceedings of the county.

The board did not specify further administrative actions tied to the drain report acceptance during the meeting; any follow-up would be handled by the Drain Commissioner's office and county administration.