Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Antioch hearing on voluntary annexation of 14 North Grand Avenue properties draws opposition over proposed solar farm
Summary
Residents seeking annexation told the Village of Antioch on July 23 they want to be brought into the village to block a proposed solar farm, raising legal and safety concerns about extraterritorial jurisdiction and firefighting runoff; the board closed the public hearing and will consider an annexation ordinance Aug. 13.
The Village of Antioch held a public hearing July 23 on a petition to voluntarily annex 14 properties along North Grand Avenue, a move petitioners said is intended to prevent a proposed large-scale solar farm.
Tom Cole, introduced to the board by the chair, told the hearing that Public Act 102-1123 gives municipalities a role over renewable-energy projects within roughly 1.5 miles of their borders. "It means that even if a property is not within a municipality's corporate limits and it falls within the municipality's 1.5 miles...the project must adhere to municipal standards or be annexed into the municipality," Cole said, arguing the properties in question fall within that zone.
James Vassesely, who identified himself as an attorney and spoke at length about procedure, urged the hearing to remain focused on statutory annexation steps. "This is a public hearing of limited jurisdiction," Vassesely said, adding that the village will research the legal materials submitted by speakers.
Several residents urged the board to approve annexation. Monica Bell, who said she lives at 40792 North Grand Avenue, said the community moved to the area for its natural features and that "this proposed solar farm project does not represent responsible planning and placement." A speaker who identified himself as a retired fire chief raised safety concerns, saying firefighting runoff from a solar farm could carry debris and battery components and "contaminate the drinking water supplies nearby aquatic ecosystem."
The board and its attorney outlined the calendar for review. Village officials said the county will hold a related public hearing July 31 at the library and the village plans another public hearing Aug. 13. The attorney said the village anticipates an annexation ordinance would be considered Aug. 13 and, if passed, published or certified on Aug. 14. He added that a county zoning order or conditional-use permit could affect the village's authority depending on timing and the county board's actions.
After public comment, the board voted to close the hearing. A motion to close the public hearing was moved (recorded as Trustee Peterson) and seconded by Trustee Pierce; the board recorded six votes in favor and declared the motion carried. The chair adjourned the public hearing.
What happens next: The village board is scheduled to consider an annexation ordinance at its Aug. 13 meeting; the county has a related hearing set for July 31. Village officials said they will review the legal materials submitted at the July 23 hearing and follow up on questions from residents, including whether local fire authorities have been consulted on potential safety impacts.
