Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Energy Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission forwards Huntington Creek Solar CUP application to county commission after presentation

Emery County Planning Commission · March 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dural presented a 240‑MW solar array and 100‑MW battery proposal for Emery County; after questions about interconnection, footprint, environmental studies and HB 16 decommissioning requirements, the planning commission found the application sufficiently complete to forward to the county commission for formal review and public hearings.

Representatives for the Huntington Creek Solar project presented a preliminary Level‑3 Conditional Use Permit application to the Emery County Planning Commission and the commission agreed to forward the application to the county commission for further review and public hearings.

Whitney Rubin of Dural Renewables described the project as a 240‑megawatt photovoltaic array paired with a 100‑megawatt battery system. She said the team has leased roughly 3,400 acres and estimated a final PV array footprint of about 1,700 acres after exclusions for topography, water features and non‑participating landowners. The project proposes to interconnect to a 345‑kV transmission line in the county and said additional collection easements (34.5 kV) and environmental studies (wetlands, cultural resources, threatened and endangered species) will be completed before construction. Rubin said HB 16’s forthcoming requirements will require a decommissioning plan and financial security, which the company expects to satisfy before building permits.

Commissioners asked detailed questions about interconnection capacity, cumulative impacts on transmission lines, visibility from Highway 10, effects on agricultural and grazing land, fencing and livestock access, and how project‑area incentives (CRA structure) would affect local tax revenue. Several commissioners recommended outreach to Rocky Mountain Power (Pacificorp) for clarity on transmission capacity and to coordinate environmental and wildlife agency reviews.

The planning commission did not take a final approval vote on the CUP; instead, after reviewing the application packet and asking follow‑up questions, it determined the submittal was complete enough to be recommended to the Emery County Commission for a formal review and public hearing process. The commission’s next steps include scheduling that review and continuing technical consultation with state agencies and Rocky Mountain Power as needed.