Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees debate changing village insurance broker as concerns about audits and timing surface
Summary
Trustees questioned a proposal to change the village's property-and-casualty insurance broker, pressed for competitive bids and raised concerns that the village's audited financials are outdated; the board voted to table the broker-of-record item to allow more information and presentations.
Trustees at the University Park board meeting on Oct. 28 debated whether to replace the village's property-and-casualty insurance broker and asked staff to solicit other brokers before making a decision.
The discussion on agenda item F2J began after Trustee Thompson requested a fuller review of the process. Several trustees said they wanted the village to issue requests for qualifications or proposals so multiple brokers could present and explain pricing and options.
The board heard from the incumbent broker, Cliff Taylor, who defended his work and said the insurance market for municipal coverage has tightened. "The market is constricted," Taylor said. "We go to the same markets. This is a niche market and we go to every market that will entertain the village to make sure we're getting the best rate." He noted the policy renewal date is Dec. 16 and said staff started the renewal process in August.
Finance and audit issues became central to the debate. Chris Marabelli, who presented the village's audit history, said that the audit the village has on file was completed in April 2020 (for fiscal year 2016), and that more recent audited financial statements are not available in the packet. That lack of current audited financials prompted trustees to press for more documentation before approving a broker change or large contract.
Trustees who opposed immediate action argued that last-minute renewals and outdated financial reporting increase risk and that residents deserve competitive bids. One trustee said the board should "slow the train" and complete RFQs and RFPs before any broker-of-record change.
After discussion, a motion to table action on item F2J carried so the board can request additional information and arrange presentations by other brokers before deciding.
The board did not take a final vote on changing the broker; staff were instructed to return with additional documentation and to schedule broker presentations.
