Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Trail Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews trail maintenance budget; member says matching grant could double funds

Midway City Parks, Trails & Trees Committee · February 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Parks, Trails & Trees Committee reviewed the standing trail maintenance allocation (historically $45,000) and discussed a potential matching grant that committee members say would double that funding and allow more resurfacing and repairs.

The Midway City Parks, Trails & Trees Committee reviewed its annual trail maintenance allocation and discussed how a matching grant could expand resurfacing work. Committee member (speaker S1) said the town’s baseline maintenance line has been $45,000 “for as long as I can remember,” and that Nancy O’Toole believes she can secure a matching grant that would double that amount if awarded.

The committee discussed how town engineer Wes Johnson typically identifies resurfacing needs—root uplift, uneven joints or sections that are aging—and then recommends where to spend that maintenance allocation. Staff member Preston (first referenced by S1 and speaking as Preston, S5) listed targeted sections under consideration this year, including Homestead Drive through Cary, Pine Canyon and sections near Bergey Park toward the roundabout by Kohler’s.

Members said resurfacing work completed last summer included Bergie Park and that additional funds would allow more extensive work, including addressing a deteriorating boardwalk and areas where roots have lifted trail surfaces. Committee discussion emphasized prioritizing safety—replacing or repairing boards that could cause trips—over cosmetic matching of stains or finishes.

Committee members asked staff to follow up with Nancy O’Toole on the matching‑grant application timeline and with Wes Johnson on engineering priorities for this year. With no quorum, the meeting produced no motions; members agreed to continue planning and to bring specific budget recommendations back when the committee can act formally.