Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elected Salaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dolores County board votes to seek legislation to change elected-official salary classification
Summary
After a lengthy budget-focused discussion, the board voted to ask the legislature to change the county's elected-official salary classification, citing CPI updates and concern about budget pressures and equity between offices.
Chair (S1) said the county's updated CPI figures for elected-official salaries require consideration and explained the statutory process for changing a county's salary category, which must be carried by a bill in the early legislative session.
The chair presented the new index figures for Dolores County and said the updated salary levels would place commissioners at $67,360, the sheriff at $75,511, treasurer/assessor/clerk at $67,360, and a part-time coroner at $15,225. The chair told the board the resolution and sponsorship need to be prepared before the January submission window for legislative proposals.
Commissioners and staff debated the timing and equity effects of dropping the county classification. A committee member (S2) argued that acting this year would widen the pay gap between commissioners and other elected officials and suggested waiting until the 2029 cycle; S2 said doing so now would "make the gap between the . . . commissioners and the rest of the county elected officials, too great." Staff and the chair discussed alternatives including a county salary schedule to make pay steps more objective and uniform.
The board discussed trade-offs: while contracting some services to neighboring counties could yield recurring savings, participants warned that savings might not be sufficient to offset increased elected-official pay without cuts to services and benefits. Staff noted the county faces declining oil-and-gas revenues and other funding pressures that inform the choice.
After discussion, Chair (S1) moved that the county seek legislative sponsorship to change the classification (motion language: to receive legislation for a change from 5C). The motion was seconded and the board voted in favor, with affirmative responses recorded in the transcript. The chair and staff agreed to draft a resolution with supporting reasons (declining oil and gas revenues, fiscal constraints, equity and public perception) to accompany the legislative request.
The board did not set a final effective date for any change; the chair said the legislative process is the authority that will determine enactment if the bill is accepted and passed. The board adjourned after completing the item.
