Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessments Resurfacing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident appeals South Brainerd resurfacing assessment, council adopts assessments but excludes appealed parcels
Summary
At a public hearing, homeowner Ben Lundeen appealed an assessment for the South Brainerd resurfacing project, citing persistent standing water and improper grading in front of his driveway; council adopted the assessments while excluding parcels under appeal and scheduled Lundeen's appeal for the next meeting.
Get email alerts on the Assessments Resurfacing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The council held a public hearing on the South Brainerd resurfacing assessment (Impr. 23‑16) on Oct. 6. Several pieces of background were discussed, and the council then heard from Ben Lundeen of 143 Carol Lane, who filed a formal appeal and presented a packet of photos and rainfall data showing chronic standing water in front of his driveway. Lundeen told council the problem existed before resurfacing, was raised during design discussions and had not been remedied by the contractor. He asked that his assessment be paused until a lasting remedy is completed or that his assessment be amended to exclude roughly 80 linear feet in front of his driveway if the fix is outside the city’s budget.
"This drainage issue is more than an inconvenience," Lundeen said, urging the council to avoid assessing property owners for work that is not functioning as intended. Staff acknowledged the appeal and confirmed the packet and PowerPoint were attached to the record.
After discussion, council adopted the assessments for the project but accepted a friendly amendment to exclude any parcels that currently have appeals on file; appeals — including Lundeen’s — will return to council for final decisions at the next meeting. Council and staff noted that contested assessments will be reviewed with the additional documentation Lundeen submitted.
Why it matters: Assessments shift some construction costs to abutting property owners; an unresolved drainage defect raises questions about whether the improvement meets expected performance before assessment is finalized.
Next steps: Lundeen’s appeal will be heard at the next council meeting along with any other contested assessments; staff and the engineer will investigate the described drainage and report back so the council can determine whether an amendment or remediation is required.

