Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves rezoning to allow multifamily overlay for First Baptist Church of Woodstock parcel

Holly Springs City Council · March 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Holly Springs staff presented and the council approved a rezoning adding an MXD (mixed-use overlay) to 4.71± acres off Hickory Road (tax parcel as stated in staff materials), allowing multifamily residential with staff stipulations including a unit limit and a two‑story cap; planning commission had recommended approval 5-0. Vote: 3-0.

The Holly Springs City Council voted to approve a rezoning request from First Baptist Church of Woodstock that adds an MXD (mixed-use overlay) to a 4.71± acre parcel off Hickory Road during the March 2, 2026 meeting.

Nancy Moon presented the application (identified in staff materials as MADash01Dash2026), saying the property had been annexed last year and that the applicant sought MXD in addition to the existing GC (general commercial) zoning to permit a multifamily residential structure. Moon said the planning commission held a public hearing and recommended approval 5-0 with staff stipulations, and she read the staff conditions into the record.

Moon stated that “the maximum number of units shall be limited to a maximum of 20 with no more than 2 stories in height.” The staff presentation also noted the applicant’s proposal included a 10‑unit multifamily structure; council discussion and the staff stipulations define the permitted maximum and height limit. The staff packet listed parcel identifiers and noted a variance the planning commission approved to allow a driveway to wrap around the building and cross a buffer area to permit a circular drive.

Council moved to approve item A with staff stipulations; the motion was seconded and carried 3-0. The record shows approval with the staff conditions described by Moon. The council did not provide funding or site‑plan approvals at this meeting; any building permits, specific site plans, or additional variances would follow standard staff and permitting review processes.

The council then moved to subsequent agenda items.