Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Property Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter asks Norcross City Council to recommend approval of vehicle-storage zoning with conditions
Summary
A presenter asked the Norcross City Council to recommend approval of a zoning request for a property used to store and maintain motor coaches and contractor equipment, citing planning-commission conditions to limit repair and parking; no formal council vote was recorded.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Property Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jan McKenzie, who said she lives in Farmington Hills and is filling in for David on the item, asked the Norcross City Council to recommend approval of a zoning request for a property the presenter said is used to store and service motor coaches and contractor equipment. "I think we're gonna ruin the city if you keep you going this direction," Jan McKenzie said during public comment, urging council members to consider community concerns.
The presenter showed slides indicating the subject property (outlined in yellow) with the portion currently zoned R100 dashed in blue and described a single 19,000-square-foot building with accessory structures. She said the site has been historically used by a motor coach service — with vans, motor coaches and trucks maintained on-site — and that a contractor, identified in the presentation as George Power, uses a fenced laydown yard on the property. The presentation also noted areas where vehicle painting and washing have occurred and mentioned an on-site fuel tank.
Planning-commission recommendations communicated in the presentation include conditions aimed at controlling parking layout and limiting areas where automobile repair and sales could occur; the presenter said the conditions were intended to preserve the property's existing operational patterns rather than to expand repair activity. The presenter asked council members to recommend approval of the rezoning with those planning-commission conditions and said she would answer questions and reserve time for rebuttal if opposition arose.
No formal motion or council vote on the rezoning was recorded in the transcript. The presenter referred at least one legal question about accommodating outdoor maintenance to the city attorney. The item was discussed as part of the work session and, according to the presenter, is expected to return for further council consideration in a future meeting.
