Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews suspension and retention data, requests deeper historical analysis
Summary
The district presented suspension and detention data for middle and high schools (high‑school totals: 36 in‑school suspensions, 30 out‑of‑school suspensions, 28 office detentions). Committee members raised concerns about low detention counts, asked for year‑over‑year comparisons and asked administration to review handbook implementation over the summer.
Smithfield administrators presented middle‑ and high‑school suspension and detention data at the June 12 School Committee meeting and committee members raised questions about underlying patterns and implementation.
The presenter explained how the data were compiled (by grade and by minutes for detentions), then summarized middle‑school totals and high‑school totals, reporting 36 in‑school suspensions, 30 out‑of‑school suspensions and 28 office detentions for the high school. The presenter cautioned that the counts may include repeat incidents and do not identify reasons for each entry.
Several committee members, most prominently a member who has volunteered frequently in district schools (speaker 4), expressed surprise at the small number of office detentions and asked for a more detailed historical breakdown, including year‑over‑year comparisons and data on reasons for suspensions and detentions. “I’m my mind is blown that we only gave out 28 office detentions at a high school,” the committee member said, and urged the administration to present more detailed reports and to involve administrators in handbook and dress‑code discussions over the summer.
Administrators acknowledged vaping, lateness and other behaviors are concerns but said RIDE guidance limits when out‑of‑school suspensions are appropriate (to substantial disruption or demonstrable threat). The presenter agreed to provide a historical overview and to invite building administrators to future meetings on handbook and discipline policy revisions.
Next steps: administration to prepare a more detailed, historical data set and to schedule summer conversations about handbook and dress‑code enforcement; committee members indicated an expectation for trends and comparative context before the next school year.
